no abstract

This research studied the way of media framing of women and race in sports news photos in online sports media in order to answer the question whether the photos of women in different sports sites reproduce a specific discourse and sign based on patriarchal and racial ideology and framing or different perspectives on the race-centered representation of women in their sports photographs. For this purpose, by using the non-probability sampling method, the photos of female athletes in the 2020 Olympics on the websites of Eurosports, Varzsh 3, Sporting news, Golf news, and Titan Sports were examined and a total of 646 photos were coded using the content analysis method, then were analyzed by SPSS software. The findings showed that there is a significant relationship between sports websites and the subject of the photo, the role of women, race and type of sport. Also, there is a significant relationship between the subject of the photo and the role of women, race and the role of women, and race and the subject of the photo with 99% confidence. The published photos suggest that women's news in sports media is framed in a way that conforms to cultural stereotypes that are used to reproduce traditional gender roles. Also, the " Underestimate" of women is seen in the policy of sports media all over the world.

In order to determine the role of the US withdrawal from Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) in 2018 in the evolution and change of the poverty framing, this study analyzes how poverty is framed in two categories of specialized (including leadership, Dolat, Mizan, Icana) and general websites (including Fars, Moj and Young Journalists Club) during 2017, 2018 and 2019. For this, it uses framing as a theory, and the technique of Pan and Kosicki’s Frame analysis as a research method. Findings are categorized in four groups as syntactical, script, thematic, and rhetorical. The review indicates that 42,302 news and reports are distributed in these websites in the research period that 275 were identified as samples and recorded and analyzed in Maxquda software. The results show that, except for the Young Journalists Club, the way poverty is framed has changed on all cases since the imposition of sanctions, and sanctions highlighted as one of the main causes of poverty in the framing of poverty. In regard of agenda setting, the coverage of poverty news and reports is less than 10%; the poverty news coverage has been declining over the three years under study. The websites of Leadership and Moj have the largest coverage, and Young Journalists Club has the least amount (less than 1%) of coverage. Due to his type of agenda setting, the problem of poverty is marginalized in public opinion. The framing of poverty with emphasis on the US withdrawal from JCPA as the cause of poverty represent poverty as a temporary issue, silences the voice of the poor, and depicts the emergence of a new social form in Iranian society.

In the present study, the understanding of how to manage meaning and content in the framing of the speeches of Trump and Rouhani on Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action(JCPOA) by news agencies ISNA, Fars, BBC Persian and Voice of America-Persian news Network (VOA-PNN) in the telegram messenger. framing theory has been used as theoretical basis for research. The Research Methodology is quantitative analysis and analysis unit is content. In this research, all the news about the event under review in the telegram channels of the news media are census in a purposive sampling. The reliability coefficient of the research was calculated based on Scott's formula, which for all variables was above 80%, which indicates the desirable reliability of the present research variables. Based on the findings of this research, in the speeches of Trump and Rouhani, the news release in ISNA, Fars and Persian BBC have been roughly the same and this news media (somewhat in the BBC) has published its contents against Trump's speech, while Most overwhelming of the Voice of America news was reflected against Rouhani's speech.

Background  Successive government public health strategies in England have described structural influences of dietrelated ill health, including obesity, while emphasising the solution of individual-level change in policy documents. This entrenchment of an individualistic policy paradigm, despite communicating a recognition of structural determinants of health on paper, has been termed “lifestyle drift.” The 2020 government strategy, Tackling Obesity, included policies to address structural determinants of health like the physical and digital food environments but ultimately failed to shift responsibility for diet-related ill health onto structural factors. This study uses the contestation of calorie labelling (CL) in the out-of-home (OOH) sector, one of the strategy’s only two implemented measures, in English newspapers to investigate how the policy is framed, and the potential role of media framing in facilitating lifestyle drift. Methods  We systematically searched the Factiva database for articles from 12 UK national newspapers that discussed CL between January 2017 and May 2022, and assessed them relative to inclusion criteria. We then used a combination of reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) and framing theory to qualitatively analyse the framing of policy problems and the solutions meant to address them. Results   A total of 177 articles met our criteria. We found that media framing often reinforced individualism, personal responsibility, and moralisation of behaviour. It also emphasised perceived mixed and inconclusive evidence of CL’s effectiveness, unfairness to businesses, and unintended consequences, including negative impacts on the economy and people living with eating disorders. Conclusion  Despite an initial shift towards framing interventions to address obesity through a structural lens in Tackling Obesity, CL legislation and accompanying news coverage reflected a drift back towards individualism. To enact effective, structural change to address diet-related public health issues, policy discourses and approaches need to move away from individualising and moralising framing of both public health problems and potential solutions.

Humans have different attitudes towards buying and consuming transgenic crops or cultivating genetically modified seeds. Various factors influence their stance and decisions about agricultural biotechnology, of which the media is one. By highlighting some aspects of this technology and hiding other aspects of it, the media try to create a certain knowledge in the audience. The risky nature of genetically modified products for humans and the environment increases the importance of informed decision making. Therefore, the present article uses the content analysis method to identify frameworks by deductive method, highlighting and tone of agricultural biotechnology news in three important Iranian news agencies. Findings show that only 4. 12% of the news studied in the period of this research is about agricultural biotechnology and the rest is related to medical biotechnology. Conflict, political prescription and evaluation, safety and health are the three main frameworks in these news agencies. Given that most of this news are about agricultural infrastructure and biotechnology as a growing field of study, most of it has been written in a positive tone. As a result, the studied news agencies have directed public opinion by highlighting the differences between different groups about different aspects of agricultural biotechnology, providing solutions to resolve conflicts, and its health effects and consequences. They have been more active in the issues of the scientific field of agro-biotechnology than issues of the transgenic products in society.

This paper intends to examine the way in which major American media have framed Iran's Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (the JCPOA). Following the nuclear agreement between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the 5+1 powers in Vienna, the event was significantly depicted on the two major mainstream media outlets of the United States, namely CNN and Fox news. The study examines these media through framing as its theoretical approach. framing, which is a prominent theory in communication and media studies, is concerned with the presentation of an issue in media. Using framing analysis, the study is based on data collected thorough an analysis of the JCPOA relevant transcripts broadcasted on CNN and Fox news during four strategic events within a threeyear period, starting from July 14, 2015. The collected data was analyzed by ATLAS. TI software to classify and place the selected frames into respective tables. By analyzing approximately 1200 deconstructed themes, the findings reveal the main coding-news of CNN and Fox news as Iranophobia, Iran's containment, Advocates vs. Opponents, US approach towards JCPOA, Iran's nuclear program, Iran’, s economy, Role of Israel as well as the JCPOA achievements. The present paper concludes that under the impact of politicized frames in the US outlets, Iran’, s nuclear program has been distorted, framed and consequently represented to the audience.

The mental images of the audience of the external realities are affected by the media’s framework. Studying the visual framing of news helps reveal the media’s portrayal of reality. The paper’s main goal is to examine the visual framing of the Turkey-Syria earthquake in Fars and Isna news agencies. The data were collected using the qualitative content analysis method provided by Zhilian Roz. According to the results, there are three main themes in framing the earthquake in Turkey in Isna and Fars news agency, including damage to nature, victims, and rescue and relief. Both news agencies examined the three themes despite their different way of framing the news. The Isna news agency analyzed two issues, one on the building destruction to highlight urban management inefficiency, and the other on victims’ situation to demonstrate crisis mismanagement. In Fars news agency, the advertising and persuasive aspect is notable, and the emphasis was put on Iran’s assistance of relief forces in Turkey. Therefore, the media doesn’t have an impartial performance in the visual framing of external realities and represents some dimensions of reality in line with the ideology of media owners.

Since late 2013, Ukrain has been the scene of various social-political events and developments. The Spark of crisis has started when Victor Yanakvych, the incumbent president refused signing a trade agreement with the EU. It provoked many people to oppose the decision by striking in Kiev’s Independence Square. These developments in the short term led to the emergence of a pro-Western government in Kiev, the separation of the Crimea and East regions from Ukraine. Aside the different aspects and origins of the crisis in Ukraine, the role and influence of the news media in shaping public opinion and directing the events are undeniable. The Cable news Network (CNN) and RT (Russia Today) along their strategic policies have framed the Ukrainian crisis in special directions. The main question of this paper is that how the satellite news networks of CNN and RT has framed the Ukrainian crisis. The hypotheses of this paper are: 1. The CNN has framed the Independence Square protests (Maidan Revolution) as well as overthrowing Viktor Yanukovych Government as popular and pro-democratic revolution. It also framed the referendum and annexation of the Crimean peninsula to Russia as aggression and occupation. But RT has framed the popular protest as Westen –provoked ilegal munity and the Crimian annexation as along democracy and International Law. The methodology of this paper based on descriptive-analysis research using content analysis. The data collection is carried out according to library resources and the Internet.